linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH, RFC 01/22] can: move CONFIG_HAVE_CAN_FLEXCAN out of CAN

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5183892B.8020400@pengutronix.de>
Date:	Fri, 03 May 2013 11:53:47 +0200
From:	Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
To:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>,
	linux-can@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH, RFC 01/22] can: move CONFIG_HAVE_CAN_FLEXCAN out of CAN_DEV

On 05/02/2013 05:16 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> CONFIG_HAVE_CAN_FLEXCAN is a silect symbol that is meant to be selected
> by platforms that support this driver, but that is not possible without
> also selecting CAN_DEV, unless we move it out of the "if CAN_DEV"
> section of the Kconfig file.
> 
> warning: (SOC_IMX28 && SOC_IMX25 && SOC_IMX35 &&
>  IMX_HAVE_PLATFORM_FLEXCAN && SOC_IMX53 && SOC_IMX6Q) selects HAVE_CAN_FLEXCAN
>  which has unmet direct dependencies (NET && CAN && CAN_DEV)

With the advent of multi platform kernels I like to get rid of
HAVE_CAN_FLEXCAN completely.

Marc

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                  | Marc Kleine-Budde           |
Industrial Linux Solutions        | Phone: +49-231-2826-924     |
Vertretung West/Dortmund          | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686  | http://www.pengutronix.de   |


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (264 bytes)