linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/5 v2] dmaengine: ste_dma40: Allow memcpy channels to be configured from DT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACRpkdZtOtnUYvLm7BPA98oMOLAMPHpJ9GLoyMXOKW1nsTDYiQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 3 May 2013 13:16:25 +0200
From:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc:	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Linus WALLEIJ <linus.walleij@...ricsson.com>,
	Srinidhi KASAGAR <srinidhi.kasagar@...ricsson.com>,
	Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>, Dan Williams <djbw@...com>,
	Per Forlin <per.forlin@...ricsson.com>,
	Rabin Vincent <rabin@....in>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5 v2] dmaengine: ste_dma40: Allow memcpy channels to be
 configured from DT

On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 11:52 AM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> wrote:

> At this moment in time the memcpy channels which can be used by the D40
> are fixed, as each supported platform in Mainline uses the same ones.
> However, platforms do exist which don't follow this convention, so
> these will need to be tailored. Fortunately, these platforms will be DT
> only, so this change has very little impact on platform data.
>
> Cc: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>
> Cc: Dan Williams <djbw@...com>
> Cc: Per Forlin <per.forlin@...ricsson.com>
> Cc: Rabin Vincent <rabin@....in>
> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>

Real nice!

But can you split this in two patches: one that changes
drivers/dma/ste_dma40* and one sequel patch that changes
Documentation/* and arch/arm/boot/dts/* so I can merge them
out-of-order?

I am trying this development cycle to split changes to the
device trees and bindings off from the rest of the patches
becaused it caused me a mess last cycle.

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/