linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH, RFC 01/22] can: move CONFIG_HAVE_CAN_FLEXCAN out of CAN

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <201305031724.15584.arnd@arndb.de>
Date:	Fri, 3 May 2013 17:24:15 +0200
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:	"Marc Kleine-Budde" <mkl@...gutronix.de>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>,
	linux-can@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH, RFC 01/22] can: move CONFIG_HAVE_CAN_FLEXCAN out of CAN_DEV

On Friday 03 May 2013, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> On 05/02/2013 05:16 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > CONFIG_HAVE_CAN_FLEXCAN is a silect symbol that is meant to be selected
> > by platforms that support this driver, but that is not possible without
> > also selecting CAN_DEV, unless we move it out of the "if CAN_DEV"
> > section of the Kconfig file.
> > 
> > warning: (SOC_IMX28 && SOC_IMX25 && SOC_IMX35 &&
> >  IMX_HAVE_PLATFORM_FLEXCAN && SOC_IMX53 && SOC_IMX6Q) selects HAVE_CAN_FLEXCAN
> >  which has unmet direct dependencies (NET && CAN && CAN_DEV)
> 
> With the advent of multi platform kernels I like to get rid of
> HAVE_CAN_FLEXCAN completely.

Yes, good idea. Are there any other dependencies we need to add then?
I assume FLEXCAN needs to depend on HAS_IOMEM and OF at least, but
there might be more.

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/