linux-kernel - Re: [git pull] GPIO for v3.10

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+55aFx4Q6tSidW2sihZSjNyRYJLftT=s8QKpx6bCe_4M0hwug@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 3 May 2013 09:56:09 -0700
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>
Cc:	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
	Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Samuel Ortiz <samuel@...tiz.org>
Subject: Re: [git pull] GPIO for v3.10

On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 9:51 AM, Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org> wrote:
>
> The real problem here is that two patches which depended on each other
> went to you through 2 different maintainer trees (mfd maintained by
> Samuel Ortiz and gpio maintained by Grant L. & Linus W.), and the git
> pull requests reached you in the wrong order. That doesn't make us all
> irresponsible and lame contributors/maintainers, does it?

F*ck yes it does.

It means that NOBODY EVEN TEST-COMPILED THE TREE THAT GOT SENT TO ME.

WTF?

If that's not "irresponsible and lame", I don't know what the hell is.

                      Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/