[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130503185751.GA22860@mtj.dyndns.org>
Date: Fri, 3 May 2013 11:57:51 -0700
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>,
containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Cgroups <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET] blk-throttle: implement proper hierarchy support
On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 01:56:52PM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> > Yeah, I think that's what *should* be happening but not what I'm
> > seeing. I'm seeing ~15% penalty.
>
> What test are you running. I am running a simple dd with directIO and
> I am not seeing any penalty.
Combination of dd and a test program that I've been using for some
while which can generate concurrent direct random IOs. Attaching the
source code for the latter.
> # set limit to 1000000 bytes/second both in parent and child cgroup
> # dd if=/dev/vdb of=/dev/null iflag=direct
>
> I will capture blktrace and analyze it though to understand better
> what's happening.
Try using larger block size. It looks like dispatch windows being
reset depending on timing is hurting the overall bandwidth. It
becomes pronounced with larger IOs.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists