lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 02 May 2013 20:51:43 -0500
From:	Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>
To:	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
CC:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>,
	"xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com" <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"rob.herring@...xeda.com" <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 0/2] (arm-soc for v3.10) arm: introduce psci_smp_ops

On 05/02/2013 03:34 PM, Olof Johansson wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 12:03 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
>> On Thursday 02 May 2013, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>>> The only issue that there is is where we are in the development cycle
>>> (almost mid merge window), and I've yet to push anything to Linus thanks
>>> to late discovery of various messups in other chunks of code submitted
>>> via my tree - I'm starting to drop stuff from my tree in the hope that
>>> I'll get back to something that's going to be suitable for mainline.
>>>
>>> I really don't want to go pulling anything else at the moment in the
>>> hope of getting what I currently have out the door.
>>>
>>> And in any case, we shouldn't be adding any new code to our trees at
>>> this point in time.
>>
>> Agreed. I would have like to see the patches in 3.10, but the timing
>> didn't work out.
>>
>> Stefano, I'm sure we can queue it up early for 3.11 if you send them
>> again after the merge window. Sorry you had to go through 10 versions
>> and not getting it merged in time in the end.
> 
> Yeah, sorry for being quiet on this; I've seen the patches go by but
> also haven't looked closely at them since timing was pointing more
> towards 3.11 material. 3.10 is already a very busy release for us on
> arm-soc.
> 
> If there's SoC code that needs this as a base, we can do a shared
> branch with Russell. That has worked well in the past -- he merges it
> but we bring in a copy of the topic in our tree.

Yes, there will be. I've got highbank about ready to go.

Rob

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ