lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 2 May 2013 21:20:13 -0700 From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> To: Colin Cross <ccross@...roid.com> Cc: Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@...roid.com>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>, Mandeep Baines <msb@...omium.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/10] freezer: add new freezable helpers using freezer_do_not_count() On Thu, May 02, 2013 at 09:17:21PM -0700, Colin Cross wrote: > > And I *hope* the lockdep annotation is stricter than what was added > > before. I think it better be "no lock ever should be held at this > > point" rather than "consider this a big lock". > > The previous patch (6aa9707099c4b25700940eb3d016f16c4434360d in Linus' > tree) already required that no locks be held, it wasn't using a lock > annotation. Ooh, cool. Thanks for the pointer. Forget about my rambling and let's just add an unsafe version of try_to_freeze() and be done with it. :) -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists