[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5187708A.20103@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 06 May 2013 16:57:46 +0800
From: Alex Shi <alex.shi@...el.com>
To: Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Preeti U Murthy <preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Michael Wang <wangyun@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/7] sched: remove SMP cover for runnable variables
in cfs_rq
On 05/06/2013 04:01 PM, Paul Turner wrote:
> On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 6:45 PM, Alex Shi <alex.shi@...el.com> wrote:
>> The following variables were covered under CONFIG_SMP in struct cfs_rq.
>> but similar runnable variables work for UP in struct rq and task_group.
>> like rq->avg, task_group->load_avg.
>> So move them out, they also can work with UP.
>
> Is there a proposed use-case for UP? My apologies if I missed it in
> an alternate patch.
> It would seem the only possibly useful thing there would the the
> per-rq average for p-state selection; but we can get that without the
> per-entity values already.
Do you mean to move the rq->avg and task_group->load_avg into CONFIG_SMP?
--
Thanks
Alex
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists