[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130506120411.GA6035@krava.brq.redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 6 May 2013 14:04:11 +0200
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@....com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/14] perf ftrace: Add 'record' sub-command
On Mon, May 06, 2013 at 10:44:56AM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> Hi Jiri,
>
> Sorry for late reply. I've been busy these days.
>
> On Thu, 25 Apr 2013 15:24:18 +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> > On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 16:12:41 +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> >> I got following lockup for record command:
> >>
> >> # ./perf --no-pager ftrace record ls
> >> ...
> >> hangs
> >>
> >> in other terminal:
> >>
> >> # pstack 14237
> >> Thread 2 (Thread 0x7f3f1aa1d700 (LWP 14241)):
> >> #0 0x0000003cec20b595 in pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.3.2 () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0
> >> #1 0x0000000000446ebe in record_ftrace_raw_buffer (arg=0x21f9ce0) at builtin-ftrace.c:451
> >> #2 0x0000003cec207d14 in start_thread () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0
> >> #3 0x0000003cebaf168d in clone () from /lib64/libc.so.6
> >> Thread 1 (Thread 0x7f3f1ba209c0 (LWP 14237)):
> >> #0 0x0000003cec208e60 in pthread_join () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0
> >> #1 0x0000000000449c8c in do_ftrace_record (ftrace=ftrace@...ry=0x7fff1377d240) at builtin-ftrace.c:682
> >> #2 0x000000000044a57b in __cmd_ftrace_record (argv=0x7fff1377d818, argc=<optimized out>, ftrace=0x7fff1377d240) at builtin-ftrace.c:1535
> >> #3 cmd_ftrace (argc=2, argv=0x7fff1377d818, prefix=<optimized out>) at builtin-ftrace.c:1655
> >> #4 0x000000000041a763 in run_builtin (p=p@...ry=0x7d58a0, argc=argc@...ry=3, argv=argv@...ry=0x7fff1377d818) at perf.c:320
> >> #5 0x0000000000419faf in handle_internal_command (argv=0x7fff1377d818, argc=3) at perf.c:377
> >> #6 run_argv (argv=0x7fff1377d600, argcp=0x7fff1377d60c) at perf.c:421
> >> #7 main (argc=3, argv=0x7fff1377d818) at perf.c:522
> >>
> >
> > How often can you reproduce it? I can't. :(
> >
> > But it looks there's a race between cond_wait() and cond_broatcast().
> > I'll take a look at that.
>
> I think the problem is that a recorder can be blocked if it received a
> broadcast signal before calling cond_wait(). So I modified the code to
> place signaling ready_cond and waiting start_cond in the same cs.
>
> Does the patch below fix your problem?
yes.. without the patch I get lockup in like 10 minutes
with the patch the test is now ok for almost an hour..
jirka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists