[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1367853344-28938-2-git-send-email-haicheng.li@linux.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 6 May 2013 23:15:41 +0800
From: Haicheng Li <haicheng.li@...ux.intel.com>
To: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk.kim@...sung.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Haicheng Li <haicheng.lee@...il.com>,
Haicheng Li <haicheng.li@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] f2fs: bugfix for alloc_nid_failed()
Directly drop the free_nid cache when nm_i->fcnt > 2 * MAX_FREE_NIDS
Since there is NOT nmi->free_nid_list_lock spinlock protection between
a sequential calling of alloc_nid() and alloc_nid_failed(), some other
threads may already add new free_nid to the free_nid_list during this
period.
We need to make sure nmi->fcnt is never > 2 * MAX_FREE_NIDS.
Signed-off-by: Haicheng Li <haicheng.li@...ux.intel.com>
---
fs/f2fs/node.c | 8 ++++++--
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.c b/fs/f2fs/node.c
index 7209d63..532ac57 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/node.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c
@@ -1439,8 +1439,12 @@ void alloc_nid_failed(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t nid)
spin_lock(&nm_i->free_nid_list_lock);
i = __lookup_free_nid_list(nid, &nm_i->free_nid_list);
BUG_ON(!i || i->state != NID_ALLOC);
- i->state = NID_NEW;
- nm_i->fcnt++;
+ if (nm_i->fcnt > 2 * MAX_FREE_NIDS)
+ __del_from_free_nid_list(i);
+ else {
+ i->state = NID_NEW;
+ nm_i->fcnt++;
+ }
spin_unlock(&nm_i->free_nid_list_lock);
}
--
1.7.9.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists