| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20130506092910.080f96cd@chukar.edge2.net> Date: Mon, 6 May 2013 09:29:10 -0600 From: Jake Edge <jake@....net> To: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net> Cc: linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@...hat.com> Subject: Re: Bisected 3.9 regression for iwl4965 connection problem to 1672c0e3 On Mon, 06 May 2013 17:24:19 +0200 Johannes Berg wrote: > On Mon, 2013-05-06 at 09:21 -0600, Jake Edge wrote: > > > > Thanks for the report. Is the AP on a passive channel by any > > > chance (5 GHz, or channels 12/13)? > > > > No, from what I can see on my router, it is using channel 36 (5.180 > > GHz) for the SSID in question > > So yes, that is a passive channel for the 4965 device :-) oops, sorry :) (obviously I don't know what a passive channel is :) > > but Stanislaw seems to have pinpointed the issue. > > Yeah that was a workaround, but I'm not sure we'd really want to do > that. I'd rather see what really caused this issue. I have a feeling > it's the passive-no-RX workaround, or lack thereof maybe? I need to > look a bit closer. Ok, I'm happy to test things out at this end ... change channels on the router, build new kernels, etc. thanks, jake -- Jake Edge - LWN - jake@....net - http://lwn.net -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists