linux-kernel - Re: Bisected 3.9 regression for iwl4965 connection problem to 1672c0e3

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1367854279.8434.13.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net>
Date:	Mon, 06 May 2013 17:31:19 +0200
From:	Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To:	Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@...hat.com>
Cc:	Jake Edge <jake@....net>, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Bisected 3.9 regression for iwl4965 connection problem to
 1672c0e3

On Mon, 2013-05-06 at 17:30 +0200, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:

> I thought this happen because 4965 firmware does not mark tx status
> ack for PROBE_REQUEST frame, because it is not acked by standard 
> ACK frame, but by PROBE_RESPONSE frame.

Actually, it is ACKed normally, but also gets a probe response :-)

(Or do we send it as multicast? I don't think we do)

> But if so, I would also see
> the breakage on my setup, but I don't - it works quite well here. 

Are you testing on a passive channel? Try with a large beacon interval.

johannes

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/