[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130506160006.GA11731@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 6 May 2013 12:00:06 -0400
From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: axboe@...nel.dk, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, lizefan@...wei.com,
containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 29.5/32] blk-throttle: add throtl_qnode for dispatch
fairness
On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 05:50:44PM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
[..]
> + * qnode_on_self is used when bios are directly queued to this
> + * throtl_grp so that local bios compete fairly with bios
> + * dispatched from children. qnode_on_parent is used when bios are
> + * dispatched from this throtl_grp into its parent and will compete
> + * with the sibling qnode_on_parents and the parent's
> + * qnode_on_self.
> + */
> + struct throtl_qnode qnode_on_self;
> + struct throtl_qnode qnode_on_parent;
Do we need one throtl_qnode for each IO dir (read/write) so that we can
queue up the right direction throtl_node in right sq->queued[rw].
Thanks
Vivek
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists