[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5187DB0C.2060605@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 06 May 2013 18:32:12 +0200
From: Daniel Mack <zonque@...il.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
CC: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Dimitris Papastamos <dp@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Subject: Re: regmap: Question about devices with unequal register sizes
On 17.02.2013 17:23, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 06:03:51PM +0100, Daniel Mack wrote:
>
>> The register layout is described on page 26, and they call their
>> registers 'subaddresses'. Up to sub-address 0x1c, I see no problem
>> mapping that to a simple 8-bit regmap layout, but above that, access
>> gets trickier because registers change their sizes, which breaks the cache.
>
> The regmap I/O code isn't making any effort to support such devices, the
> hardware is just too crazy to worry about. The best you can do is use
> the no-bus support and open code your physical I/O so you can still use
> the cache.
So it turns out I need to write these registers now on the TAS5086
codec, which has such a strange layout. I wonder how I can possibly open
code the physical I/O with registers that are up to 20 bytes in size,
while the reg_write callback in struct regmap_config assumes an unsigned
int suffices for the data? Any example you can point me to?
Thanks,
Daniel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists