[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130506175401.GD4562@krava.brq.redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 6 May 2013 19:54:01 +0200
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Corey Ashford <cjashfor@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...il.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/8] perf tests: Add automated tests for formula object
On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 09:18:05AM -0600, David Ahern wrote:
> On 5/1/13 9:15 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> >+static int __test_basics(char *file)
> >+{
> >+ struct perf_formula fml;
> >+ struct perf_formula_set *set;
> >+ struct perf_formula_counter *counter;
> >+ struct perf_evlist *evlist;
> >+ struct perf_evsel *evsel;
> >+ struct perf_counts *counts;
> >+ struct perf_formula_expr expr;
> >+ int ret;
> >+
> >+ pr_debug("file %s\n", file);
> >+
> >+ perf_formula__init(&fml);
> >+
> >+ ret = perf_formula__load(&fml, file);
> >+ TEST_ASSERT_VAL("failed to load formula", !ret);
>
> With all the asserts when something goes wrong you should delete the
> file right after perf_formula__load. so maybe
>
> file = file_get(data, sizeof(data));
> ret = perf_formula__load(&fml, file);
> file_put(file);
hum, the TEST_ASSERT_VAL call 'return' from __test_basics on error and
that goes back to test_basics where file_put is called..
thanks,
jirka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists