[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130506203104.730053565@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 6 May 2013 13:45:25 -0700
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org,
Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>
Subject: [ 089/115] NFSv4: Handle NFS4ERR_DELAY and NFS4ERR_GRACE in nfs4_lock_delegation_recall
3.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>
commit dbb21c25a35a71baf413f5176f028ee11b88cfbc upstream.
A server shouldn't normally return NFS4ERR_GRACE if the client holds a
delegation, since no conflicting lock reclaims can be granted, however
the spec does not require the server to grant the lock in this
instance.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
--- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
@@ -5025,6 +5025,12 @@ int nfs4_lock_delegation_recall(struct n
nfs4_schedule_stateid_recovery(server, state);
err = 0;
goto out;
+ case -NFS4ERR_DELAY:
+ case -NFS4ERR_GRACE:
+ set_bit(NFS_DELEGATED_STATE, &state->flags);
+ ssleep(1);
+ err = -EAGAIN;
+ goto out;
case -ENOMEM:
case -NFS4ERR_DENIED:
/* kill_proc(fl->fl_pid, SIGLOST, 1); */
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists