[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130506203059.071374615@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 6 May 2013 13:44:30 -0700
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
Subject: [ 034/115] xen/smp/spinlock: Fix leakage of the spinlock interrupt line for every CPU online/offline
3.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
commit 66ff0fe9e7bda8aec99985b24daad03652f7304e upstream.
While we don't use the spinlock interrupt line (see for details
commit f10cd522c5fbfec9ae3cc01967868c9c2401ed23 -
xen: disable PV spinlocks on HVM) - we should still do the proper
init / deinit sequence. We did not do that correctly and for the
CPU init for PVHVM guest we would allocate an interrupt line - but
failed to deallocate the old interrupt line.
This resulted in leakage of an irq_desc but more importantly this splat
as we online an offlined CPU:
genirq: Flags mismatch irq 71. 0002cc20 (spinlock1) vs. 0002cc20 (spinlock1)
Pid: 2542, comm: init.late Not tainted 3.9.0-rc6upstream #1
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff811156de>] __setup_irq+0x23e/0x4a0
[<ffffffff81194191>] ? kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x221/0x250
[<ffffffff811161bb>] request_threaded_irq+0xfb/0x160
[<ffffffff8104c6f0>] ? xen_spin_trylock+0x20/0x20
[<ffffffff813a8423>] bind_ipi_to_irqhandler+0xa3/0x160
[<ffffffff81303758>] ? kasprintf+0x38/0x40
[<ffffffff8104c6f0>] ? xen_spin_trylock+0x20/0x20
[<ffffffff810cad35>] ? update_max_interval+0x15/0x40
[<ffffffff816605db>] xen_init_lock_cpu+0x3c/0x78
[<ffffffff81660029>] xen_hvm_cpu_notify+0x29/0x33
[<ffffffff81676bdd>] notifier_call_chain+0x4d/0x70
[<ffffffff810bb2a9>] __raw_notifier_call_chain+0x9/0x10
[<ffffffff8109402b>] __cpu_notify+0x1b/0x30
[<ffffffff8166834a>] _cpu_up+0xa0/0x14b
[<ffffffff816684ce>] cpu_up+0xd9/0xec
[<ffffffff8165f754>] store_online+0x94/0xd0
[<ffffffff8141d15b>] dev_attr_store+0x1b/0x20
[<ffffffff81218f44>] sysfs_write_file+0xf4/0x170
[<ffffffff811a2864>] vfs_write+0xb4/0x130
[<ffffffff811a302a>] sys_write+0x5a/0xa0
[<ffffffff8167ada9>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
cpu 1 spinlock event irq -16
smpboot: Booting Node 0 Processor 1 APIC 0x2
And if one looks at the /proc/interrupts right after
offlining (CPU1):
70: 0 0 xen-percpu-ipi spinlock0
71: 0 0 xen-percpu-ipi spinlock1
77: 0 0 xen-percpu-ipi spinlock2
There is the oddity of the 'spinlock1' still being present.
Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
arch/x86/xen/smp.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
--- a/arch/x86/xen/smp.c
+++ b/arch/x86/xen/smp.c
@@ -662,6 +662,7 @@ static void xen_hvm_cpu_die(unsigned int
unbind_from_irqhandler(per_cpu(xen_debug_irq, cpu), NULL);
unbind_from_irqhandler(per_cpu(xen_callfuncsingle_irq, cpu), NULL);
unbind_from_irqhandler(per_cpu(xen_irq_work, cpu), NULL);
+ xen_uninit_lock_cpu(cpu);
xen_teardown_timer(cpu);
native_cpu_die(cpu);
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists