[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201305062324.17080.arnd@arndb.de>
Date: Mon, 6 May 2013 23:24:16 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@...x.de>, tglx@...utronix.de
Cc: Jamie Iles <jamie@...ieiles.com>, dinguyen@...era.com, wd@...x.de,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, olof@...om.net,
kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
john.stultz@...aro.org
Subject: Re: dw_apb_timer_of.c: remove parts that were picoxcell-specific
On Monday 06 May 2013, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Mon 2013-05-06 15:45:22, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Monday 06 May 2013, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > Ping? Previous version was tested by Dinh, and this one is based on
> > > Jamie's updates, so I assume it is acceptable for him, too.
> > >
> > > It brings two platforms closer together, and makes time actually work
> > > on socfpga. It would be good to get it applied.
> >
> > Who should apply it? I guess it needs to go through arm-soc with all the
> > other clocksource changes already queued up there. Can we have an Ack
> > from Jamie and from the clocksource maintainers?
>
> Well, changes to arch/arm/mach-picoxcell are single line (and that's a
> cleanup of duplicate include).
The point is that Jamie had comments on the earlier version, so it would
be good to see his Ack on the current one.
> So I guess it should go through the timekeeping tree...?
I would prefer that, but we can also take it through arm-soc, it doesn't
really matter.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists