[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1069B54B-C9CD-4333-B56F-B0E1D740CADB@kymasys.com>
Date: Mon, 6 May 2013 16:11:34 -0700
From: Sanjay Lal <sanjayl@...asys.com>
To: David Daney <ddaney.cavm@...il.com>
Cc: linux-mips@...ux-mips.org, ralf@...ux-mips.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
David Daney <david.daney@...ium.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mips/kvm: Fix ABI for compatibility with 64-bit guests.
On May 6, 2013, at 3:39 PM, David Daney wrote:
>
> /* for KVM_GET_REGS and KVM_SET_REGS */
> +/*
> + * If Config[AT] is zero (32-bit CPU), the register contents are
> + * stored in the lower 32-bits of the struct kvm_regs fields and sign
> + * extended to 64-bits.
> + */
> struct kvm_regs {
> - __u32 gprs[32];
> - __u32 hi;
> - __u32 lo;
> - __u32 pc;
> + /* out (KVM_GET_REGS) / in (KVM_SET_REGS) */
> + __u64 gpr[32];
> + __u64 hi, lo;
> + __u64 pc;
> +};
>
> - __u32 cp0reg[N_MIPS_COPROC_REGS][N_MIPS_COPROC_SEL];
Hi David, I'll try out the diff with QEMU and confirm that it works as expected. Could you just leave the GPR field in kvm_regs as "gprs". Its a minor change but avoids diffs that just replace "gprs" with "gpr".
Regards
Sanjay
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists