[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHGf_=rvYP8jFYHULbJJo4by7eqsPKE_qR+6xcBebLNsMn1=mw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 6 May 2013 22:57:38 -0400
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...il.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Olivier Langlois <olivier@...llion01.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] posix-cpu-timers: don't account cpu timer after
stopped thread runtime accounting
>> + /*
>> + * After turning over se.sum_exec_runtime to sig->sum_sched_runtime
>> + * in __exit_signal(), we must not account exec_runtime for consistency.
>> + */
>> + if (unlikely(!tsk->sighand))
>> + return;
>
> Ok, if we want the clock and timer to be consistent, do we also want the same check in
> account_group_user_time() and account_group_system_time()? The task can still account
> a tick after autoreaping itself between release_task() and the final schedule().
You are right.
That said, current the man pages don't describe this linux specific
extensions. So, nobody
(glibc, ltp, and me) tested them. Please give me a couple of days.
I'll test and fix this features
too.
timer_create(2): http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/timer_create.2.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists