[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <518844A4.8040203@ti.com>
Date: Mon, 6 May 2013 19:02:44 -0500
From: Suman Anna <s-anna@...com>
To: Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@...il.com>
CC: <loic.pallardy@...com>, <arnd@...db.de>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Jassi Brar <jaswinder.singh@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 0/4] mailbox: Common API
Hi Jassi,
On 05/06/2013 02:22 AM, Jassi Brar wrote:
> Hello,
> I have made the implementation look more proper. Also made some changes
> suggested by Suman. Changes since V1:
>
> * Delete timer upon mailbox release
> * Filled in the stub ipc_links_unregister()
> * Check kzalloc return for errors.
> * Add the controller driver for OMAP2 class. I have taken the patch
> for mailbox's hwmod from Suman's. The clients are yet to be converted
> but this should be enough to convey the idea that the API could
> work for OMAP as well. If I had access to STE documentation, I might
> have done some implementation for U8500 as well.
The bug fixes in this series look good in general. I have provided my
design comments in the previous RFC thread [1] still, since the overall
changes here are not that much different from the RFC.
Thanks for prototyping the OMAP portions, it demonstrates the adaptation
to the new API, but I have to take a step approach in moving the current
OMAP mailbox code and making incremental changes on top of it. The
mailbox driver is the bottom-most layer in our IPC stacks, so changes at
this layer are very critical to the functional behavior.
regards
Suman
[1] http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org/msg429678.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists