linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/1] ktime: Use macro NSEC_PER

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5188C578.4030907@redhat.com>
Date:	Tue, 07 May 2013 11:12:24 +0200
From:	Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>
To:	Liu Ying <liu.y.victor@...il.com>
CC:	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, davem@...emloft.net,
	tglx@...utronix.de, john.stultz@...aro.org,
	Liu Ying <Ying.Liu@...escale.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] ktime: Use macro NSEC_PER_USEC instead of a magic
 number

On 05/07/2013 11:08 AM, Liu Ying wrote:
> 2013/5/7 Liu Ying <liu.y.victor@...il.com>
>> 2013/5/7 Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>
>>> On 05/06/2013 02:42 PM, y@...inux1.ap.freescale.net wrote:
>>>> From: Liu Ying <Ying.Liu@...escale.com>

>>> If you only have 1 patch, then you don't need "1/1" in the subject.
>>> The term magic number here might be a little exaggerated, not so
>>> magic actually. :-)
>>>
>> Thanks. I will update this. How about turning "magic number" to "immediate
>> number"?

Maybe like ``ktime: Use macro NSEC_PER_USEC where appropriate''.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/