linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Tree for May 6 (b43/bcma)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1367918136.8328.1.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net>
Date:	Tue, 07 May 2013 11:15:36 +0200
From:	Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To:	Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net>
Cc:	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-wireless <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
	b43-dev@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for May 6 (b43/bcma)

On Mon, 2013-05-06 at 22:06 -0500, Larry Finger wrote:

> > Probably mostly due to B43=y and BCMA=m.
> 
> Does any Kconfig wizard know the magic incantation to accomplish the following:
> 
> 1. Ensure that if SSB and BMCA are both selected, then both are either "m" or "y"

I think one of them being m and the other y should be OK? But do they
have interdependencies?

> 2. Ensure that BRCMSMAC is not "y" if BMCA is "m".

Isn't that a simple
	depends on BCMA
or maybe it can work w/o BCMA, then you'd have
	depends on BCMA || !BCMA

> 3. Ensure that B43 is not "y" if SSB and/or BCMA is "m".

same.

johannes

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/