linux-kernel - Re: How does commit 47ec340c not introduce a bug?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130507095238.GA4387@zurbaran>
Date:	Tue, 7 May 2013 11:52:38 +0200
From:	Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@...il.com>
Cc:	Uwe Kleine-König 
	<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>, Robin Holt <holt@....com>,
	Qing Xu <qingx@...vell.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: How does commit 47ec340c not introduce a bug?

On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 05:35:28PM +0800, Haojian Zhuang wrote:
> > It's probably best to make this:
> >
> > static inline max8925_backlight_dt_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
> >                                 struct max8925_backlight_pdata *pdata)
> > {
> >         return -ENODEV;
> > }
> >
> 
> I've submitted this patch to fix this issue for a long time.
> 
> Samuel,
> 
> Should I send it again?
To the backlight maintainers, yes. I carried 47ec340c as it was part of an MFD
patchset, but now that it's upstream I shouldn't take any patches for it.

Cheers,
Samuel.

-- 
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
http://oss.intel.com/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/