[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1367887826.4484.2.camel@pasglop>
Date: Tue, 07 May 2013 10:50:26 +1000
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Gavin Shan <shangw@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] PCI: Split pci_assign_unassigned_resources to per
root bus
On Mon, 2013-05-06 at 16:15 -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> BenH reported that there is some assign unassigned resource problem
> in powerpc.
>
> It turns out after
> | commit 0c5be0cb0edfe3b5c4b62eac68aa2aa15ec681af
> | Date: Thu Feb 23 19:23:29 2012 -0800
> |
> | PCI: Retry on IORESOURCE_IO type allocations
>
> even the root bus does not have io port range, it will keep retrying
> to realloc with mmio.
>
> Current retry logic is : try with must+optional at first, and if
> it fails will try must then try to extend must with optional.
> That will fail as mmio-non-pref and mmio-pref for bridge will
> be next to each other. So we have no chance to extend mmio-non-pref.
Shouldn't you do completely separate passes for IO and MMIO through the
whole lot instead since they are completely separate address spaces ?
IE. Even a legit setup with IOs, in case of failures on the IO side
(resource exhaustion, FW bugs, ...) we shouldn't retry the memory side
and vice-versa.
Note that I'm a bit worried by how invasive your proposed patch is. I
will let Gavin test it and if it works I'm happy but keep in mind that I
really need that fixed in 3.10 ... (especially since there are noises
around about a certain enterprise distro using that version...)
Cheers,
Ben.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists