[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <B256D81BAE5131468A838E5D7A24364154238AF5@penmbx02>
Date: Tue, 7 May 2013 01:11:17 +0000
From: "Yang, Wenyou" <Wenyou.Yang@...el.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
"Ferre, Nicolas" <Nicolas.FERRE@...el.com>
CC: "grant.likely@...retlab.ca" <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@...il.com>,
"Joachim Eastwood" <manabian@...il.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"plagnioj@...osoft.com" <plagnioj@...osoft.com>,
"Lin, JM" <JM.Lin@...el.com>,
"spi-devel-general@...ts.sourceforge.net"
<spi-devel-general@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v6 01/16] spi/spi-atmel: fix probing failure after
xfer->speed_hz set
Hi, Mark
> From: Mark Brown [mailto:broonie@...nel.org]
> Sent: 2013年5月6日 18:31
> To: Ferre, Nicolas
> Cc: grant.likely@...retlab.ca; Grant Likely; Richard Genoud; Yang, Wenyou;
> Joachim Eastwood; linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org;
> plagnioj@...osoft.com; Lin, JM; spi-devel-general@...ts.sourceforge.net;
> linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 01/16] spi/spi-atmel: fix probing failure after
> xfer->speed_hz set
>
> On Thu, May 02, 2013 at 12:34:55PM +0200, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
>
> > Can you tell us if this SPI patch will be merged upstream using one of
> > your paths?
>
> I have no idea what patch this is but if it's not in my tree -next it's unlikely to be
> merged.
This is dropped patch, no need to be merged.
We tested Atmel spi in your tree-next , but it doesn't work, the reason is the Joachim Eastwood's patch is not included.
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2165301/
which Joachim said that Grant said he applied.
Thanks
Best Regards,
Wenyou Yang
Powered by blists - more mailing lists