linux-kernel - Re: dw_apb_timer_of.c: remove parts that were picoxcell-specific

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130507135752.GA3500@amd.pavel.ucw.cz>
Date:	Tue, 7 May 2013 15:57:52 +0200
From:	Pavel Machek <pavel@...x.de>
To:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:	tglx@...utronix.de, Jamie Iles <jamie@...ieiles.com>,
	dinguyen@...era.com, wd@...x.de,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, olof@...om.net,
	kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	john.stultz@...aro.org
Subject: Re: dw_apb_timer_of.c: remove parts that were picoxcell-specific

On Mon 2013-05-06 23:24:16, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Monday 06 May 2013, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > On Mon 2013-05-06 15:45:22, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > On Monday 06 May 2013, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > Hi!
> > > > 
> > > > Ping? Previous version was tested by Dinh, and this one is based on
> > > > Jamie's updates, so I assume it is acceptable for him, too.
> > > > 
> > > > It brings two platforms closer together, and makes time actually work
> > > > on socfpga. It would be good to get it applied.
> > > 
> > > Who should apply it? I guess it needs to go through arm-soc with all the
> > > other clocksource changes already queued up there. Can we have an Ack
> > > from Jamie and from the clocksource maintainers?
> > 
> > Well, changes to arch/arm/mach-picoxcell are single line (and that's a
> > cleanup of duplicate include). 
> 
> The point is that Jamie had comments on the earlier version, so it would
> be good to see his Ack on the current one.

He sent his Ack this morning.

> > So I guess it should go through the timekeeping tree...?
> 
> I would prefer that, but we can also take it through arm-soc, it doesn't
> really matter.

I see no response from timekeeping people... so if you could take it,
that would be great.

Thanks,
									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/