[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5189152C.4010703@hp.com>
Date: Tue, 07 May 2013 10:52:28 -0400
From: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@...com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CC: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Chandramouleeswaran, Aswin" <aswin@...com>,
"Norton, Scott J" <scott.norton@...com>,
Fr??d??ric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf: fix symbol processing bug and greatly improve performance
On 05/07/2013 10:19 AM, Waiman Long wrote:
> The slowdown that I was trying to fix was in the "perf record" part of
> the profiling process, not the "perf report" part. I didn't try
> perf-record on perf-record as the performance counters are limited
> resources and I don't want resource conflicts to affect the results.
> As the slow-down was entirely in the user space, I decided to use
> gprof to do the profiling.
Just to clarify that the post-processing time that I referred to in the
patch is the time spent after the workload finishes in the perf-record
session and the perf command itself quits. I could take a really long
time for perf to quit without the patch.
Regards,
Longman
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists