[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130507150423.GA13062@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 7 May 2013 11:04:23 -0400
From: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
To: Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: 3.9+ tty lockdep trace.
On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 10:14:09AM -0400, Peter Hurley wrote:
> >> Just hit this again, by switching tty's during bootup.
> >> The previous time was switching from X to console iirc, so that seems to be
> >> the key to triggering this.
> >
> > Sorry for not getting back to this sooner, merge window fun...
> >
> > Anyway, Peter, could this be something that your ldisc patches are
> > triggering?
>
> Yes, although early analysis also suggests the lockdep splat is possible
> regardless, just much less likely.
>
> I looked at this over the weekend, but I wasn't able to determine (in
> the limited time I had available) if the splat was valid; ie., if the
> cpu states could actually be concurrent and result in deadlock.
>
> I need to study the VT_DISALLOCATE ioctl in more detail which I plan
> to do this week.
I don't know if it proves/disproves anything, but shortly before the dump
gets printed, everything is kind of locked up. I can switch tty's, but
the gettys on them are dead to the world until after the dump.
ISTR a pause for a while when I hit this switching from X too.
Dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists