linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL 0/5] ARM: Third batch of arm-soc changes for 3.10, again

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 7 May 2013 11:01:21 -0700
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:	ARM SoC <arm@...nel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL 0/5] ARM: Third batch of arm-soc changes for 3.10, again

On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 10:26 AM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
>
> Here are the same pull requests as before, with numbers and distinct
> time stamps. I hope I didn't screw up in a different way this time.

Ok, I notice that you seem to have forgotten the "--summary" flag from
your diffstat in your new script.

Not a showstopper, but make sure that the diffstat flags are

  "git diff -M --stat --summary"

(And yes, I prefer "-M", not "-C", because while copy information is
interesting, it tends to hide the fact that the copying added a lot of
lines, so the "-C" flag ends up not giving as good line add/del
information, even if the data that something looks like a copy of
another file is interesting).

              Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/