[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130507185800.GA10713@kroah.com>
Date: Tue, 7 May 2013 11:58:00 -0700
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Wang YanQing <udknight@...il.com>, jslaby@...e.cz,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH]TTY: Fix tty can't be restarted by TCXONC ioctl request
On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 02:47:34AM +0800, Wang YanQing wrote:
> I meet emacs hang in start if I do the operation below:
> 1: echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
> 2: emacs BigFile
> 3: Press CTRL-S follow 2 immediately
>
> Then emacs hang on, CTRL-Q can't resume, the terminal
> hang on, you can do nothing with this terminal except
> close it.
>
> The reason is before emacs takeover control the tty,
> we use CTRL-S to XOFF it. Then when emacs takeover the
> control, it may don't use the flow-control, so emacs hang.
> But after search the emacs's startup codes, I find they use TCXONC
> to workaround this situation:
>
> /* This code added to insure that, if flow-control is not to be used,
> we have an unlocked terminal at the start. */
> if (!tty_out->flow_control) ioctl (fileno (tty_out->input), TCXONC, 1);
> ioctl (fileno (tty_out->input), TCXONC, 1);
>
> But this workaround never work due the kernel's current code.
> This patch fix it.
>
> Below is the ChangeLog introduce the tty->flow_stopped flag:
>
> Thu Nov 21 10:05:22 1996 Theodre Ts'o <tytso@...alhost.mit.edu>
>
> * tty_ioctl.c (tty_wait_until_sent): Always check the driver
> wait_until_ready routine, even if there are no characters
> in the xmit buffer. (There may be charactes in the device
> FIFO.)
> (n_tty_ioctl): Add new flag tty->flow_stopped which
> indicates whether the tty is stopped due to a request by
> the TCXONC ioctl (used by tcflow). If so, don't let an
> incoming XOFF character restart the tty. The tty can only
> be restarted by another TCXONC request.
>
> So I think this patch make TCXONC can restart tty which stopped by
> STOP_CHAR don't break the original meaning.
>
> This patch will fix some strange tty relation hang problem,
> I believe I meet it with vim in ssh, and also see below bug report:
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=465823
So this has been a problem since 1996? Or is it newly introduced due to
some changes in this area in a newer kernel?
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists