[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130507204642.D010DDC1@viggo.jf.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 07 May 2013 13:46:42 -0700
From: Dave Hansen <dave@...1.net>
To: mmarek@...e.cz
Cc: linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Dave Hansen <dave@...1.net>
Subject: [PATCH 0/7] Put "Kernel hacking" Kconfig menu on a diet
Michal, I figure you're the most logical person for these to go
through.
There is a fair amount of churn in the areas around these patches
so I've resolved conflicts a couple of times. For the patches that
are almost purely code move patches, I'm doing this:
cat foo.patch | grep '^[-+]' | perl -pe 's/^.//' | sort | uniq -c | sort -n
and watching for any non-even numbers coming out of uniq. This
helps me make sure I'm not adding/removing code that I should not
be.
The Signed-off-by's in here look funky. I changed employers
while working on this set, so I have signoffs from both email
addresses.
---
I think the "Kernel Hacking" menu has gotten a bit out of hand. It
is over 120 lines long on my system with everything enabled and
options are scattered around it haphazardly.
http://sr71.net/~dave/linux/kconfig-horror.png
Let's try to introduce some sanity. This set takes that 120 lines
down to 55 and makes it vastly easier to find some things. It's a
start.
This set stands on its own, but there is plenty of room for follow-up
patches. The arch-specific debug options still end up getting stuck
in the top-level "kernel hacking" menu. OPTIMIZE_INLINING, for
instance, could obviously go in to the "compiler options" menu, but
the fact that it is defined in arch/ in a separate Kconfig file keeps
it on its own for the moment.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists