lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 7 May 2013 16:48:34 -0400
From:	yan cui <ccuiyyan@...il.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: readahead window size benchmarking

Dear all:

    I am new to the Linux readahead system. After reading the recent
kernel code (3.8.8), I find there is an initial window size decided
based on the read size. And it will increase the window size to a
maximal value (32 pages) if the detected reading is sequential. To me,
the window size seems an important parameter to performance. However,
after testing using some home-made micro-benchmarks, I find that
performance is not sensible to this parameter. So, I wonder to know
what benchmarks (or applications) do you use to test the performance
difference when using different window size? Why not just use the
fixed window size (e.g., 32 pages)?


Thanks,
Yan

--
Think big; Dream impossible; Make it happen.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ