linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/6] ASoC: ab8500-codec: Add missing ad_to

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 8 May 2013 09:47:22 +0100
From:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To:	Fabio Baltieri <fabio.baltieri@...aro.org>
Cc:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
	alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	Ola Lilja <ola.o.lilja@...ricsson.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] ASoC: ab8500-codec: Add missing ad_to_slot
 definitions

On Wed, 08 May 2013, Fabio Baltieri wrote:

> On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 08:53:28AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > I'm sure this is just me, but:
> > 
> > >    0 to  7 corresponds to AD_OUTx slots
> > > char * const enum_ad_to_slot_map[] = {"AD_OUT1",    0
> >                                                       1..5 ???
> > >  					"AD_OUT7",    6
> > >  					"AD_OUT8",    7
> 
> I'm a bit confused... the first one was from the diff header, while OUT7 and
> OUT8 are context lines, so 1 to 5 are already there but not shown in the
> patch.  The final array is like:
> 
> static const char * const enum_ad_to_slot_map[] = {"AD_OUT1",
>                                         "AD_OUT2",
>                                         "AD_OUT3",
>                                         "AD_OUT4",
>                                         "AD_OUT5",
>                                         "AD_OUT6",
>                                         "AD_OUT7",
>                                         "AD_OUT8",
>                                         "zeroes",
>                                         "zeroes",
>                                         "zeroes",
>                                         "zeroes",
>                                         "tristate",
>                                         "tristate",
>                                         "tristate",
>                                         "tristate"};
> 
> Is it ok?

Yes, I see that now.

Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>

> > >    8 to 11 corresponds to zero output
> > >  					"zeroes",     8
> > > +					"zeroes",     9
> > > +					"zeroes",     10
> > > +					"zeroes",     11
> > >   12 to 15 sets the output in tristate mode
> > > +					"tristate",   12
> > > +					"tristate",   13
> > > +					"tristate",   14
> > >  					"tristate"};  15
> > 
> > 
> 

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/