[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5750435.WVYuIYMX2V@avalon>
Date: Wed, 08 May 2013 12:37:29 +0200
From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
To: Prabhakar Lad <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
LMML <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...hat.com>,
DLOS <davinci-linux-open-source@...ux.davincidsp.com>,
Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@...co.com>,
Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@....de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@....fi>,
Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v3] media: i2c: mt9p031: add OF support
Hi Prabhakar,
On Wednesday 08 May 2013 10:19:57 Prabhakar Lad wrote:
> On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 7:32 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Tuesday 07 May 2013 15:10:36 Prabhakar Lad wrote:
> >> On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 8:29 PM, Prabhakar Lad wrote:
> >> > On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 8:04 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
> >> >> On Friday 03 May 2013, Prabhakar Lad wrote:
> >> > [snip]
> >> >
> >> >>> +}
> >> >>
> >> >> Ok, good.
> >> >>
> >> >>> @@ -955,7 +998,17 @@ static int mt9p031_probe(struct i2c_client
> >> >>> *client,
> >> >>>
> >> >>> mt9p031->pdata = pdata;
> >> >>> mt9p031->output_control = MT9P031_OUTPUT_CONTROL_DEF;
> >> >>> mt9p031->mode2 = MT9P031_READ_MODE_2_ROW_BLC;
> >> >>>
> >> >>> - mt9p031->model = did->driver_data;
> >> >>> +
> >> >>> + if (!client->dev.of_node) {
> >> >>> + mt9p031->model = (enum
> >> >>> mt9p031_model)did->driver_data;
> >> >>> + } else {
> >> >>> + const struct of_device_id *of_id;
> >> >>> +
> >> >>> + of_id =
> >> >>> of_match_device(of_match_ptr(mt9p031_of_match),
> >> >>> + &client->dev);
> >> >>> + if (of_id)
> >> >>> + mt9p031->model = (enum
> >> >>> mt9p031_model)of_id->data;
> >> >>> + }
> >> >>>
> >> >>> mt9p031->reset = -1;
> >> >>
> >> >> Is this actually required? I thought the i2c core just compared the
> >> >> part of the "compatible" value after the first comma to the string, so
> >> >> "mt9p031->model = (enum mt9p031_model)did->driver_data" should work
> >> >> in both cases.
> >> >
> >> > I am OK with "mt9p031->model = (enum mt9p031_model)did->driver_data"
> >> > but I see still few drivers doing this, I am not sure for what reason.
> >> > If everyone is OK with it I can drop the above change.
> >>
> >> My bad, while booting with DT the i2c_device_id ie did in this case will
> >> be NULL, so the above changes are required :-)
> >
> > I've just tested your patch, and did isn't NULL when booting my
> > Beagleboard with DT (on v3.9-rc5).
>
> I am pretty much sure you tested it compatible property as "aptina,mt9p031"
> if the compatible property is set to "aptina,mt9p031m" the did will be NULL.
I've tested both :-)
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists