[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201305081416.06611.arnd@arndb.de>
Date: Wed, 8 May 2013 14:16:06 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>
Cc: Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>,
Bastian Hecht <hechtb+renesas@...il.com>,
Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/21] ARM: shmobile: don't call irqchip_init unconditionally
On Thursday 02 May 2013, Simon Horman wrote:
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/intc-r8a7740.c b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/intc-r8a7740.c
> > > index 8871f77..5dc57f1 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/intc-r8a7740.c
> > > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/intc-r8a7740.c
> > > @@ -53,14 +53,23 @@ static void __init r8a7740_init_irq_common(void)
> > >
> > > void __init r8a7740_init_irq_of(void)
> > > {
> > > + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF))
> > > + return;
> > > +
> > > irqchip_init();
> >
> > Why not have an empty irqchip_init? I'd guess we'll need this on other
> > platforms and your default mach.
>
> Thanks, I think that could work.
>
> I will see about making it so.
Ping
Linux-next is still broken for me. There is also anothe shmobile build bug,
I'll send a separate patch for that, which also needs to go into your tree.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists