[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5189B1AE.4000906@asianux.com>
Date: Wed, 08 May 2013 10:00:14 +0800
From: Chen Gang <gang.chen@...anux.com>
To: Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>
CC: tj@...nel.org, containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Suggestion] kernel/cgroup.c: about kfree after 'get_new_cssid'
On 2013年05月08日 08:50, Li Zefan wrote:
>>> There's a bug in cgroup_unload_subsys() that idr_destroy() should be called after
>>> >> ss->css_free(). That said, given there's no modular cgroup subsystem using css_id,
>>> >> and the whole css_id thing will be eliminated in 3.11, why bother fixing it.
>>> >>
>> >
>> > I just find it by reading code (I also want to learn about kernel).
>> >
>> > I guess, for some stable versions, may focus on it, they are the
>> > different branches from the latest version.
>> >
>> > So, is it suitable to send related patch for the bug ?
>> >
> As I said, there's no modular cgroup subsystem using css_id, so the bug
> doesn't exist in real world.
>
>
>
Excuse me, my English is not quite well, I guess what you said is:
a. idr_destroy() should be called after ss->css_free()
b. need check the return value of cgroup_init_idr() in cgroup_init().
but all features which related with the 2 issues above, never be used
in any main linux main branches.
so, the 2 bugs doesn't exist in real world.
Is what I guess correct ?
Thanks.
--
Chen Gang
Asianux Corporation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists