[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130508161102.GB8459@dyad.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 8 May 2013 18:11:02 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Alex Shi <alex.shi@...el.com>
Cc: mingo@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
arjan@...ux.intel.com, bp@...en8.de, pjt@...gle.com,
namhyung@...nel.org, efault@....de, morten.rasmussen@....com,
vincent.guittot@...aro.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, viresh.kumar@...aro.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, len.brown@...el.com,
rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com, jkosina@...e.cz,
clark.williams@...il.com, tony.luck@...el.com,
keescook@...omium.org, mgorman@...e.de, riel@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] sched: use runnable load based balance
On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 03:51:14PM +0800, Alex Shi wrote:
> On 05/03/2013 03:55 PM, Alex Shi wrote:
> >
> >> That should probably look like:
> >>
> >> preempt_disable();
> >> raw_spin_unlock_irq();
> >> preempt_enable_no_resched();
> >> schedule();
> >>
> >> Otherwise you might find a performance regression on PREEMPT=y kernels.
> >
> > Yes, right!
> > Thanks a lot for reminder. The following patch will fix it.
> >>
>
> Peter, would you like to pick this patch?
There's this huge series from walken that touches the same code.. I'll wait to
see what happens with that.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists