lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130508181353.23991.17852@localhost.localdomain>
Date:	Wed, 8 May 2013 14:13:53 -0400
From:	Chris Mason <chris.mason@...ionio.com>
To:	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
CC:	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] SLAB changes for v3.10

[ Sorry if I break the threading on this, I had to pull it off gmane ]

On Tue, 7 May 2013, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> OK got it narrowed down to CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK=y causing the problem
> with commit 8a965b3b. Ain't nothing like bisecting and booting and then
> diffing .config files on top of that.

I'm unable to boot with slab on current Linus -master, and bisected it
down almost as far as Tony did before trying SLUB and then finding this
thread.   My box is a standard x86-64, nothing exciting and spinlock
debugging isn't on.

A few printks stuffed into Christoph's code:

cache ffff88047f000080 at index 5
creating slab cache at 6
create special cache #1 (this is kmalloc_caches[1])
cache ffff88047f0001c0 at index 7
creating slab cache at 8
creating slab cache at 9
creating slab cache at 10
... more get created

Pulling this into the code from commit 8a965b3b:

        for (i = KMALLOC_SHIFT_LOW; i <= KMALLOC_SHIFT_HIGH; i++) {
                if (!kmalloc_caches[i]) {
                        kmalloc_caches[i] = create_kmalloc_cache(NULL,
                                                        1 << i, flags);

                        /*
                         * Caches that are not of the two-to-the-power-of size.
                         * These have to be created immediately after the
                         * earlier power of two caches
                         */
                        if (KMALLOC_MIN_SIZE <= 32 && !kmalloc_caches[1] && i == 6)
                                kmalloc_caches[1] = create_kmalloc_cache(NULL, 96, flags);

                        if (KMALLOC_MIN_SIZE <= 64 && !kmalloc_caches[2] && i == 7)
                                kmalloc_caches[2] = create_kmalloc_cache(NULL, 192, flags);
                }
        }

kmalloc_caches[7] was not null, and so kmalloc_caches[2] was never
created.

I get this oops (with early printk on)

------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel BUG at mm/slab.c:1635!
invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
Modules linked in:
CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 3.9.0-josef+ #920
Hardware name: Supermicro X9SRE/X9SRE-3F/X9SRi/X9SRi-3F/X9SRE/X9SRE-3F/X9SRi/X9SRi-3F, BIOS 1.0a 03/06/2012
task: ffffffff8196a410 ti: ffffffff8195a000 task.ti: ffffffff8195a000
RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff81a49c9d>]  [<ffffffff81a49c9d>] kmem_cache_init_late+0x40/0x7d
RSP: 0000:ffffffff8195bf78  EFLAGS: 00010282
RAX: 00000000fffffff4 RBX: ffff88047f006480 RCX: 000000000000ff31
RDX: 000000000000000e RSI: 0000000000000046 RDI: ffffffff81baf238
RBP: ffffffff8195bf80 R08: 0000000000000400 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000002fa4 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffffffff81ab58d0
R13: ffffffff81abd2c0 R14: ffff88047ffaf0c0 R15: 0000000000000000
FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88047fc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: ffff88047ffff000 CR3: 0000000001965000 CR4: 00000000000406b0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Stack:
 ffffffffffffffff ffffffff8195bfc0 ffffffff81a25b64 ffffffff81a2573d
 ffffffff81abd2c0 0000000000003000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
 0000000000000000 ffffffff8195bfd0 ffffffff81a2547f ffffffff8195bfe8
Call Trace:
 [<ffffffff81a25b64>] start_kernel+0x235/0x394
 [<ffffffff81a2573d>] ? repair_env_string+0x58/0x58
 [<ffffffff81a2547f>] x86_64_start_reservations+0x2a/0x2c
 [<ffffffff81a25548>] x86_64_start_kernel+0xc7/0xca
Code: 53 e8 40 57 bd ff 48 8b 05 21 f2 f4 ff 48 8d 58 a8 48 8d 43 58 48 3d a0 8e 99 81 74 1a 31 f6 48 89 df e8 ba 7f 6d ff 85 c0 74 02 <0f> 0b 48 8b 5b 58 48 83 eb 58 eb da 48 c7 c7 70 8e 99 81 e8 e6
RIP  [<ffffffff81a49c9d>] kmem_cache_init_late+0x40/0x7d
 RSP <ffffffff8195bf78>
---[ end trace 2e5587581263f881 ]---

This patch fixes things for me, but to maintain the rules from
Christoph's patch,  kmalloc_caches[2] should have been created whenever
kmalloc_caches[7] was done.

diff --git a/mm/slab_common.c b/mm/slab_common.c
index d2517b0..ff3218a 100644
--- a/mm/slab_common.c
+++ b/mm/slab_common.c
@@ -446,18 +446,18 @@ void __init create_kmalloc_caches(unsigned long flags)
 		if (!kmalloc_caches[i]) {
 			kmalloc_caches[i] = create_kmalloc_cache(NULL,
 							1 << i, flags);
+		}
 
-			/*
-			 * Caches that are not of the two-to-the-power-of size.
-			 * These have to be created immediately after the
-			 * earlier power of two caches
-			 */
-			if (KMALLOC_MIN_SIZE <= 32 && !kmalloc_caches[1] && i == 6)
-				kmalloc_caches[1] = create_kmalloc_cache(NULL, 96, flags);
+		/*
+		 * Caches that are not of the two-to-the-power-of size.
+		 * These have to be created immediately after the
+		 * earlier power of two caches
+		 */
+		if (KMALLOC_MIN_SIZE <= 32 && !kmalloc_caches[1] && i == 6)
+			kmalloc_caches[1] = create_kmalloc_cache(NULL, 96, flags);
 
-			if (KMALLOC_MIN_SIZE <= 64 && !kmalloc_caches[2] && i == 7)
-				kmalloc_caches[2] = create_kmalloc_cache(NULL, 192, flags);
-		}
+		if (KMALLOC_MIN_SIZE <= 64 && !kmalloc_caches[2] && i == 7)
+			kmalloc_caches[2] = create_kmalloc_cache(NULL, 192, flags);
 	}
 
 	/* Kmalloc array is now usable */
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ