[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1368038420-19879-1-git-send-email-jlayton@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 8 May 2013 14:40:20 -0400
From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>
To: sds@...ho.nsa.gov, james.l.morris@...cle.com, eparis@...isplace.org
Cc: linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] selinux: make return code consistent with conflicting context= settings on same superblock
Commit 094f7b69ea73 adds a new check to ensure that when we clone an
existing superblock that the contexts match properly. We do however have
another place where you can hit similar problems in
selinux_set_mnt_opts. That function returns -EINVAL, whereas
selinux_sb_clone_mnt_opts returns -EBUSY in this situation.
I think -EBUSY is probably more descriptive of the situation here. The
context= option would have worked had the superblock not already been in
use. Fix selinux_set_mnt_opts to return -EBUSY instead of -EINVAL in
this situation.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>
---
security/selinux/hooks.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/security/selinux/hooks.c b/security/selinux/hooks.c
index 5c6f2cd..348f069 100644
--- a/security/selinux/hooks.c
+++ b/security/selinux/hooks.c
@@ -745,7 +745,7 @@ out:
mutex_unlock(&sbsec->lock);
return rc;
out_double_mount:
- rc = -EINVAL;
+ rc = -EBUSY;
printk(KERN_WARNING "SELinux: mount invalid. Same superblock, different "
"security settings for (dev %s, type %s)\n", sb->s_id, name);
goto out;
--
1.7.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists