[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130508135029.ffbeefa6b8154bee31e7bbbe@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 8 May 2013 13:50:29 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Robin Holt <holt@....com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Guan Xuetao <gxt@...c.pku.edu.cn>, Russ Anderson <rja@....com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
Arm Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v8 11/11] Move arch/x86 reboot= handling to generic
kernel.
On Tue, 7 May 2013 09:39:55 -0500 Robin Holt <holt@....com> wrote:
> Merge together the unicore32, arm, and x86 reboot= command line
> parameter handling.
>
> ...
>
> +static int __init reboot_setup(char *str)
> +{
> + for (;;) {
> + /*
> + * Having anything passed on the command line via
> + * reboot= will cause us to disable DMI checking
> + * below.
> + */
> + reboot_default = 0;
> +
> + switch (*str) {
> +#if defined(CONFIG_X86) || defined(CONFIG_X86_64)
> + case 'w':
> + reboot_mode = REBOOT_WARM;
> + break;
> +
> + case 'c':
> + reboot_mode = REBOOT_COLD;
> + break;
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> + case 's':
> + if (isdigit(*(str+1))) {
> + reboot_cpu = (int) (*(str+1) - '0');
> + if (isdigit(*(str+2)))
> + reboot_cpu = reboot_cpu*10 + (int)(*(str+2) - '0');
> + }
Boy, that's some weird stuff.
What's wrong with doing
if (isdigit(str[1])) {
reboot_cpu = str[1] - '0';
if (isdigit(str[2]))
reboot_cpu = reboot_cpu * 10 +
str[2] - '0';
}
?
But it's still nonsense - we should eliminate its
you-have-less-than-101-CPUs restriction by using, you know, atoi().
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists