[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACVXFVMd_iRtEM8ZLK6Ps66gZO6SCp1mXSgY6JbWtRJjJUh+ag@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 9 May 2013 18:07:56 +0800
From: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@...il.com>
To: Saravana Kannan <skannan@...eaurora.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lrg@...com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] driver core: Add API to wait for deferred probe to
complete during init
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 1:18 PM, Saravana Kannan <skannan@...eaurora.org> wrote:
>
> The most obvious fallback of using late_initcall_sync() also doesn't work
> since the deferred probing work initated during late_initcall() is done in
> a workqueue. So, frameworks that want to wait for all devices to finish
> probing during init will now have to wait for the deferred workqueue to
> finish it's work. This patch adds a wait_for_init_deferred_probe_done() API
flush_workqueue() has been added in deferred_probe_initcall(), so looks it
should be OK for your problem, doesn't it?
Thanks,
--
Ming Lei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists