[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130509103939.GD668@arm.com>
Date: Thu, 9 May 2013 11:39:40 +0100
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To: Denis Efremov <yefremov.denis@...il.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@....com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"trivial@...nel.org" <trivial@...nel.org>,
"ldv-project@...uxtesting.org" <ldv-project@...uxtesting.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/21] arm64: delay: remove inline marking of
EXPORT_SYMBOL functions
On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 11:36:52AM +0100, Denis Efremov wrote:
> EXPORT_SYMBOL and inline directives are contradictory to each other.
> The patch fixes this inconsistency.
>
> Found by Linux Driver Verification project (linuxtesting.org).
>
> Signed-off-by: Denis Efremov <yefremov.denis@...il.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/lib/delay.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/lib/delay.c b/arch/arm64/lib/delay.c
> index dad4ec9..368ca15 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/lib/delay.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/lib/delay.c
> @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ void __delay(unsigned long cycles)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(__delay);
>
> -inline void __const_udelay(unsigned long xloops)
> +void __const_udelay(unsigned long xloops)
> {
> unsigned long loops;
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists