[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <518BAB0B.60401@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 09 May 2013 07:56:27 -0600
From: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, acme@...stprotocols.net,
mingo@...nel.org, fweisbec@...il.com, peterz@...radead.org,
jolsa@...hat.com, xiaoguangrong@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/13] perf kvm: add live mode
On 5/9/13 2:45 AM, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> On Wed, 8 May 2013 22:31:46 -0600, David Ahern wrote:
> [SNIP]
>> +static int perf_kvm__timerfd_create(struct perf_kvm_stat *kvm)
>> +{
>> + struct itimerspec new_value;
>> + struct timespec now;
>> + int rc = -1;
>> +
>> + kvm->timerfd = timerfd_create(CLOCK_MONOTONIC, TFD_NONBLOCK);
>> + if (kvm->timerfd < 0) {
>> + pr_err("timerfd_create failed\n");
>> + goto out;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC, &now) != 0) {
>> + pr_err("clock_gettime failed: %d\n", errno);
>> + close(kvm->timerfd);
>> + goto out;
>> + }
>> +
>> + new_value.it_value.tv_sec = now.tv_sec + kvm->display_time;
>> + new_value.it_value.tv_nsec = now.tv_nsec;
>> + new_value.it_interval.tv_sec = kvm->display_time;
>> + new_value.it_interval.tv_nsec = 0;
>> +
>> + if (timerfd_settime(kvm->timerfd, TFD_TIMER_ABSTIME,
>> + &new_value, NULL) != 0) {
>
> Looks like no need to use ABSTIME.
hmmm.... I did that for a reason. I forget why now. Let me poke around
with it and see if I can remember.
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists