[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <24DF37198A1E704D9811D8F72B87EB514192495F@NB-EX-MBX02.diasemi.com>
Date: Thu, 9 May 2013 14:18:59 +0000
From: Anthony Olech <Anthony.Olech@...semi.com>
To: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@....de>,
Krystian Garbaciak <Krystian.Garbaciak@...semi.com>
CC: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
"Jean Delvare" <khali@...ux-fr.org>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Richard Purdie <rpurdie@...ys.net>
Subject: RE: [RFC PATCH 2/8] regulator: Add Dialog DA906x voltage regulators
support.
Hi Guennadi Liakhovetski,
Now that Krystian no longer works for Dialog I think that I might be your best contact.
As far as I am aware without doing any checking, the DA906x driver should possibly cover the DA9063.
If you need a driver, that would imply that you have some chips. Have you tried our marketting department?
Best regards,
Tony Olech
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Guennadi Liakhovetski [mailto:g.liakhovetski@....de]
> Sent: 09 May 2013 15:06
> To: Krystian Garbaciak
> Cc: Mark Brown; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; Samuel Ortiz; Alessandro
> Zummo; Jean Delvare; Dmitry Torokhov; Richard Purdie; Anthony Olech
> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/8] regulator: Add Dialog DA906x voltage regulators
> support.
>
> (trimmed the CC a bit)
>
> Hi Krystian
>
> On Fri, 31 Aug 2012, Krystian Garbaciak wrote:
>
> > > On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 03:50:00PM +0100, Krystian Garbaciak wrote:
>
> Sorry for picking up a random mail from this old thread, unfortunately, I don't
> have "0/8" in my archive.
>
> I have to write a driver for the da9063 PMIC. Do you have an idea, whether it'd
> be compatible with this driver? Do you plan to continue your work on this driver
> or would you mind if I try to use these your patches and mainline them,
> preserving your authorship and copyright, of course?
>
> Thanks
> Guennadi
>
> > > > Because, for some regulators, this is required: val +=
> > > > fvol->offset, I was only able to reduce it to the following form.
> > >
> > > What on earth makes you say this? The above is obviously linear.
> > >
> > > Besides, you're missing several points here. One is that you should
> > > be using the framework features, another is that you should be
> > > implementing _sel.
> >
> > Sorry, I've missed an obvious thing here. Instead of adding selector
> > offset at runtime, I can substract apropriate voltage from .min_uV.
> > Thanks for pointing this out.
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
> > linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> >
>
> ---
> Guennadi Liakhovetski, Ph.D.
> Freelance Open-Source Software Developer http://www.open-technology.de/
Legal Disclaimer: This e-mail communication (and any attachment/s) is confidential and contains proprietary information,
some or all of which may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it
is addressed. Access to this email by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure,
copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful.
Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists