linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Tree for May 8 (dlm)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 9 May 2013 12:50:28 -0400
From:	David Teigland <teigland@...hat.com>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>, swhiteho@...hat.com
Cc:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	cluster-devel@...hat.com, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for May 8 (dlm)

On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 09:47:45AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> [Just forwarding to David ...]
> 
> On Wed, 08 May 2013 11:04:45 -0700 Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org> wrote:
> >
> > on x86_64:
> > 
> > when CONFIG_GFS2_FS_LOCKING_DLM=y and CONFIG_DLM=m:
> > 
> > fs/built-in.o: In function `gfs2_lock':
> > file.c:(.text+0xa512c): undefined reference to `dlm_posix_get'
> > file.c:(.text+0xa5140): undefined reference to `dlm_posix_unlock'
> > file.c:(.text+0xa514a): undefined reference to `dlm_posix_lock'

gfs2/file.c calls the dlm directly, so I suppose gfs2 itself needs
to depend on the dlm.  It's been like this for a long time, so I
don't know why it only appeared now.

> > fs/built-in.o: In function `gdlm_cancel':
> > lock_dlm.c:(.text+0xb3f57): undefined reference to `dlm_unlock'
> > fs/built-in.o: In function `gdlm_unmount':
> > lock_dlm.c:(.text+0xb40ff): undefined reference to `dlm_release_lockspace'
> > fs/built-in.o: In function `sync_unlock.isra.4':
> > lock_dlm.c:(.text+0xb420d): undefined reference to `dlm_unlock'
> > fs/built-in.o: In function `sync_lock.isra.5':
> > lock_dlm.c:(.text+0xb42d9): undefined reference to `dlm_lock'
> > fs/built-in.o: In function `gdlm_put_lock':
> > lock_dlm.c:(.text+0xb45e7): undefined reference to `dlm_unlock'
> > fs/built-in.o: In function `gdlm_mount':
> > lock_dlm.c:(.text+0xb4928): undefined reference to `dlm_new_lockspace'
> > lock_dlm.c:(.text+0xb4c75): undefined reference to `dlm_release_lockspace'
> > fs/built-in.o: In function `gdlm_lock':
> > lock_dlm.c:(.text+0xb529f): undefined reference to `dlm_lock'

lock_dlm.c is GFS2_FS_LOCKING_DLM which depends on DLM.
Is that not correct?

Dave

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/