[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1368119535.7373.125.camel@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Thu, 09 May 2013 13:12:15 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
yrl.pp-manager.tt@...achi.com, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/11] ftrace: Cleanup regex_lock and ftrace_lock around
hash updating
On Thu, 2013-05-09 at 14:44 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> Cleanup regex_lock and ftrace_lock locking points around
> ftrace_ops hash update code.
>
> The new rule is that regex_lock protects ops->*_hash
> read-update-write code for each ftrace_ops. Usually,
> hash update is done by following sequence.
>
> 1. allocate a new local hash and copy the original hash.
> 2. update the local hash.
> 3. move(actually, copy) back the local hash to ftrace_ops.
> 4. update ftrace entries if needed.
> 5. release the local hash.
>
> This makes regex_lock to protect #1-#4, and ftrace_lock
> to protect #3 and #4.
Patch looks good, but I don't see how ftrace_lock protects #3. The two
things that I see ftrace_lock protecting is the update to the ftrace
entries, and the adding and removing ftrace_ops to the ftrace_ops_list.
-- Steve
>
> Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>
> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
> Cc: Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@...el.com>
> ---
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists