lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 9 May 2013 10:48:22 -0700 From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net> To: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu> Cc: linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, lm-sensors@...sensors.org, Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>, Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Jingoo Han <jg1.han@...sung.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] pm: Introduce __pm to mark power management code On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 01:38:36PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote: > On Thu, 9 May 2013, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > > The following patch series introduces a marker for power management functions > > and data. This this marker, #ifdef CONFIG_PM and #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP > > can be removed from most of the code. This ensures that the conditional code > > still compiles but is not included in the object file. > > > > As a side effect, drivers declaring struct dev_pm_ops unconditionally > > get a bit smaller if CONFIG_PM_SLEEP is not configured. > > What about code that depends on CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME? Or code that > depends on CONFIG_PM_SLEEP but not on CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME? > Should we also introduce __pm_sleep and __pm_runtime ? Thanks, Guenter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists