[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130509110333.f6ba3b4cc22e87c7adb30993@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 9 May 2013 11:03:33 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Jean-Francois Dagenais <jeff.dagenais@...il.com>
Cc: zbr@...emap.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] w1: ds2408: add magic sequence to disable P0 test
mode
On Tue, 7 May 2013 10:00:48 -0400 Jean-Francois Dagenais <jeff.dagenais@...il.com> wrote:
> V2: use the new bus_mutex
>
> extract from http://datasheets.maximintegrated.com/en/ds/DS2408.pdf:
>
> Power-up timing
> The DS2408 is sensitive to the power-on slew rate and can inadvertently
> power up with a test mode feature enabled. When this occurs, the P0 port
> does not respond to the Channel Access Write command.
> For most reliable operation, it is recommended to disable the test mode
> after every power-on reset using the Disable Test Mode sequence shown
> below. The 64-bit ROM code must be transmitted in the same bit sequence
> as with the Match ROM command, i.e., least significant bit first. This
> precaution is recommended in parasite power mode (VCC pin connected to
> GND) as well as with VCC power.
>
> Disable Test Mode:
> RST,PD,96h,<64-bit DS2408 ROM Code>,3Ch,RST,PD
>
> ...
>
> --- a/drivers/w1/slaves/w1_ds2408.c
> +++ b/drivers/w1/slaves/w1_ds2408.c
> @@ -301,7 +301,32 @@ error:
> return -EIO;
> }
>
> +/**
/** is used to introduce kerneldoc comments, but this isn't a kerneldoc
comment. Just use /* here.
> + * This is a special sequence we must do to ensure the P0 output is not stuck
> + * in test mode. This is described in rev 2 of the ds2408's datasheet
> + * (http://datasheets.maximintegrated.com/en/ds/DS2408.pdf) under
> + * "APPLICATION INFORMATION/Power-up timing".
> + */
> +static int w1_f29_disable_test_mode(struct w1_slave *sl)
> +{
> + int res;
> + u8 magic[10] = {0x96, };
> + u64 rn = le64_to_cpu(*((u64*)&sl->reg_num));
> + memcpy(&magic[1], &rn, 8);
> + magic[9] = 0x3C;
(please put a blank line between end-of-locals and start-of-code)
The casting looks decidedly dodgy. I guess it won't cause an unalignned
exception due to reg_num's alignment, but it appears to defeat the
endianness handling in the definotion of `struct w1_reg_num'.
Are you sure this will work OK with all architectures and both
__LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD and __BIG_ENDIAN_BITFIELD?
> + mutex_lock(&sl->master->bus_mutex);
>
> + res = w1_reset_bus(sl->master);
> + if (res)
> + goto out;
> + w1_write_block(sl->master, magic, ARRAY_SIZE(magic));
> +
> + res = w1_reset_bus(sl->master);
> +out:
> + mutex_unlock(&sl->master->bus_mutex);
> + return res;
> +}
>
> static struct bin_attribute w1_f29_sysfs_bin_files[] = {
> {
> @@ -362,6 +387,10 @@ static int w1_f29_add_slave(struct w1_slave *sl)
> int err = 0;
> int i;
>
> + err = w1_f29_disable_test_mode(sl);
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> +
> for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(w1_f29_sysfs_bin_files) && !err; ++i)
> err = sysfs_create_bin_file(
> &sl->dev.kobj,
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists