[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <518C0788.8060200@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 09 May 2013 22:31:04 +0200
From: Helge Deller <deller@....de>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
CC: Linux Kernel Development <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] parisc updates for v3.10
Hi Stephen,
On 05/08/2013 03:37 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> On Wed, 8 May 2013 00:11:02 +0200 Helge Deller <deller@....de> wrote:
>>
>> please pull the parisc architecture updates for v3.10 from:
>>
>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/deller/parisc-linux.git parisc-for-3.10
>
> Does this mean that the parisc tree I have in linux-next
> (git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jejb/parisc-2.6.git#for-next)
> is defunct?
Not sure. It will be either James or me who will send pull requests...
Of course we will agree who of us will do that and from which tree.
So, would it hurt if you add a second parisc tree for linux-next?
I've just created a "for-next" branch in my git repository:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/deller/parisc-linux.git#for-next
Helge
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists